The RFC process of this model is frozen by the Authors
The team is investigating a simpler SSLAP solution that wouldn't use SSLDM2 at all.
if this approach succeed, we do not need SSLDM2 anymore.
Laurent.Michel 08/05/2020
SSL-DM V2.0
This is the RFC page for the 2nd version of the Simple Spectral Lines Data Model.
PR document is accessible
here
VODML file is accessible
here
Reference Implementation
Services implementing SLAP2 /
SSLDM 2 :
http://sesam.obspm.fr/19.04/vamdc/slap/capabilities : sprectoscopic VUV data for H2, D2, HD and CO
http://topbase.obspm.fr/19.04/vamdc/slap/capabilities : LS-coupling energy levels for astrophysically abundant ions (Z=1,14; Z=16; Z=18; Z=20; Z=26) computed in the Opacity Project
Implementations Validators
Lines endpoint validator
Species endpoint validator
Slap V2 client prototype has been implemented in CASSIS
You can select the SLAP service in the
Cassis database settings menu and display the lines over spectra and click on it to have the informations about the lines. The SLAP database path is
http://sesam.obspm.fr/19.04/vamdc/slap/ For more information, see talk about
CASSIS at IVOA Groningen 2019-Netherlands
RFC Review Period: 2019-10-01 - 2019-11-13
TBC
Comments from TCG member during the RFC/TCG Review Period: 2019-10-01 - 2019-11-13
WG chairs or vice chairs must read the Document, provide comments if any (including on topics not directly linked to the Group matters) or indicate that they have no comment.
IG chairs or vice chairs are also encouraged to do the same, althought their inputs are not compulsory.
TCG Chair & Vice Chair (Patrick Dowler, Janet Evans)
[Education Interest Group]] (Chenzhou Cui, Hendrik Heinl)
[Knowledge Discovery Interest Group]] (Kai Lars Polsterer, Matthew Graham)
I am no expert on this subject, have some technical comments only for now.
This model is not Single .. but Simple Spectral Lines Data Model (I have fixed the header of this page)
The PDF seems to have been created form th docx with track changes enabled. There is a wide right margin.
The VO-DML file has some issues:
* <name> of the model is 'template'. That name is to be used as prefix when referring to the model, hence would likely need to be something like 'ssldm' or better 'ssl' to conform with other data models that do not add the 'dm' suffix?
* There are a lot of missing descriptions, indicated by elements like the following which are generated by the xmi2vodml pipeline when a missing describption field is found in a UML document.
<description>
TODO : Missing description : please, update your UML model asap.
</description>
Operations (Mark Taylor, Steve Groom)
TCG Vote : 2019-10-01 - 2019-11-13
If you have minor comments (typos) on the last version of the document please indicate it in the Comments column of the table and post them in the TCG comments section above with the date.
Group | Yes | No | Abstain | Comments |
TCG |
|
|
|
|
Apps |
|
|
|
|
DAL |
|
|
|
|
DM |
|
|
|
|
GWS |
|
|
|
|
Registry |
|
|
|
|
Semantics |
|
|
|
|
DCP |
|
|
|
|
KDIG |
|
|
|
|
SSIG |
|
|
|
|
Theory |
|
|
|
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
Ops |
|
|
|
|
StdProc |
|
|
|
|