Attendees : Bruno, Antara, Mark CD, Francesca, Francois, Ian, Jutta, Mark Kettenis, Mathieu, Mireille, Raffaele, Janet
Regrets :
Zoom
Actions
HEIG: Initiate an Endorsed Note on Obscore with suggested keywords unique to HE, common and suggested for the core Obscore model, or in common with Radio from their document.
HEIG: Stay focused on HE and work to encompass by defining the extension & core components for all of the data products that we want to be discoverable through the registry.
Meeting Agenda
Meeting notes in BOLD - currently just partially filled in (2/11)
Discuss current state of Obscore work and priority for HEIG, here's a shot at it ...
Registry and where it belongs in the scheme of things wrt Obscore
We discussed that core keywords to Obscore would go in the Obscore standard and managed by DM; that information on the TAP service and how the registry is accessed will be directed to DAL; and that extensions unique to a waveband would be managed by the IGs in an Endorsed Note. Also note that along with Radio & HE, there is work ongoing for a Time extension.
Open questions for DAL: using extensions in parallel to the core ObsCore or incorporation of new keywords into ObsCore?
Review HE drafty Obscore table
Ian stepped through the table he organized; he emphasized that queries made by scientists needed to be straight forward for them to use the VO and benefit from this work; Vocabulary and UCD need to be also updated with the HE needs
Review of Radio extension and overlap with keywords of interest to HE
Bruno stepped through the Radio Draft document (#2 above) and highlighted the many overlaps with keywords of interest to TeV and HE data; he raised the question whether the keyword in the extension should not go into the core, generalising the definitions/descriptions; he noted that the "HE ObsCore extension" might be larger than the "radio ObsCore extension".
Mark K reminded us that there are several ObsCore inputs for one data product (PS from Bruno: which might be the case also for some TeV data providers)
We discussed about "GTI" (also known as Stable Time Intervals (STI)), for which the use cases differ depending on the data level. To be discussed in detail in a following meeting.
Next steps:
Compare the Radio extension(#2 above) to the HE working doc (#5 above). Does it add to the doc we have so far?
Write up the HE working table (#5 above) to be more definitive so folks can review and comment. Write it up in the form of a Note. Identify Core Obscore keywords and HE extension keywords. Have this doc ready for the Baltimore Interop.
Prepare with DM/DAL and plan a way forward at the next Interop. Is it a session, plenary, or pre-Interop meeting day on this topic??