TWiki
>
IVOA Web
>
IvoaDataModel
>
ObsDMCoreComponents
>
ObsTAPdraftDiscussion
>
SugText
(revision 5) (raw view)
Edit
Attach
+ Discussion of additional topics, (mostly) regarding non-mandatory fields (by IVOA.JuanDeDiosSantanderVela) * =target_class= is defined as being a member of a special vocabulary, either from Simbad, NED, or defined in other IVOA vocabulary. I would either remove the ambiguity by applying a prefix, or better yet mandate that said vocabularies are to be published in SKOS form (as per the IVOA Vocabularies Note), and a reference to them added in a field =target_class_vocabulary_url=, or similar. * =obs_creator_name= should not be =creator_id=, to maintain a relationship similar to that between =obs_publisher_did= and =publisher_id=? If there is a creator other than the publisher, it should have an entry in a VO Registry. * =obs_creator_did= is not defined clearly. A discussion appears in SSA, that it should either be referred to, or brought to the !ObsTAP document (where I think it makes more sense). Plus, it should be made clear that for publishers who are the same entities creating the data, =obs_creator_did= and =obs_publisher_did= can (should?) be the same. * =bib_reference= is set with UCD meta.bib, as if it only could contain an ADS _bibcode_, but some publications might make use of the DOI, more generic than the _bibcode_. Should DOIs be allowed? Then we would need a new UCD (see list of proposed UCDs to go with !ObsTAP). * =obs_release_date=: if =obs_release_date= is NULL, =data_rights= (if present), *must be* "proprietary". * =s_ucd= is proposed to be either =pos=, or =uv=, but no UCD for =uv= exists. I think it should not be =pos=, but =pos.eq= (as we are mandating ICRS coordinates). Instead of UV, I propose to have one of the following: * =pos.uv= (with sub UCDs =pos.uv.u= and =pos.uv.v=) * =pos.eq; arith.fft= (adding an =arith.fft= UCD) * =s_calib_status= is said to be one of =NOT CALIBRATED=, =FINE=, or =COARSE=, while for other =[te]_calib_status= strings are lowercase. Shouldn't this be made so? * =t_resolution= can be made NULL. A recommendation was made to set =t_resolution= to =t_exptime= for non time-resolved frames. Wouldn't it be better that NULL mean non-time resolved frames, and time-resolved ones had the corresponding =t_resolution= value? * =t_calib_status= has no attached enumeration. I see arguments both to support the same one as in =s_calib_status= (i.e. =not calibrated=, =fine=, or =coarse=), or to go with the spectral ones (=calibrated=, =uncalibrated=, =relative=, =normalized=). We should decide, and specify which one. * =em_ucd= calls their values from the SSA proposal, but actually one less UCD is recommended from those specified by the SSA Recommendation. I think having =arith.log= qualifiers for =em_ucd= would help in the logarithmic cases, and =spect.dopplerVeloc; arith.ratio= can be used for c based redshift. * =em_res_power= should be specified as freq/delta_freq when =em_ucd= is =em.freq=, and =energy/delta_energy= when =em_ucd= is =em.energy=. * =o_ucd= should not be allowed to be NULL, if present. If it is, for me it means the dataset corresponds to a non-well known observable, and little software could work with it, so why put it in the VO? * =o_units= should follow the units proposal (including scaling) proposed by Pedro Osuna et al. in their note on accessing Spectral data using SIAP: http://ivoa.net/Documents/Notes/SADimEq/SpectrumAccess_DimensionalEquation-20040521.pdf * =o_units= must be present if any of =o_detection_limit= or =o_stat_error= are provided. * =facility= should be the same as in theVOResource medata for registering facilities, and should also be registered with the ADS: http://vo.ads.harvard.edu/dv/facilities.txt * =instrument= should also have a place in the Registry, but possibly this discussion falls outside of !ObsTAP. + Material to help for implementation (proposed by Igor Chilingarian) * provide online files of Appendix C (TAP_SCHEMA tables, sql code example for tables initialisation) * provide online version of some queries exposed in the use-cases and obtained results + Some proposals for missing, or alternate UCDs (by IVOA.JuanDeDiosSantanderVela) * =access.estsize=: could be =phys.size; meta.file= * =s_region=: could need a new one to support STC-based footprints, analogous to =instr.fov=; then, the UCD would be =pos; instr.footprint=. * =obs_creator_name=: could be a new one, =meta.id.creator=, similar to =meta.id.PI=, or =meta.id.parent=. Also, a primary/secondary (Q) =meta.creation= might be added, and =meta.id; meta.creation= be used. * =o_ucd=: could be =meta.ucd; obs=. * =s_ucd=: could be =meta.ucd; pos=. * =em_ucd=: could be =meta.ucd; em=. * =data_rights=: could be =meta.curation; meta.code=, or =meta.code; meta.curation=; however, both are Primary UCDs, which does not allow for the combination. * =em_stat_error=: could be =stat.error; em.wl= instead, as we will always use wavelength. * =obs_title=: could be =meta.title; obs=. * =s_resolution_min=: should be =pos.angResolution; stat.min=. * =s_resolution_max=: should be =pos.angResolution; stat.max=. * =t_calib_status=: could be =meta.code.status; instr.calib; time=. * =facility=: could be =meta.id; instr.tel=. * =instrument=: could be =meta.id; instr=. + Data model declaration The way the TAPRegExt document currently is written, the text on p. 25 should be rewritten. I'd suggest the text starting with "Services that implement the !ObsCore model..." should become <blockquote> Services supporting the !ObsCore model should advertize this fact using <verbatim> <dataModel ivo-id="ivo://ivoa.net/std/ObsCore/v1.0">ObsCore 1.0</dataModel> </verbatim> as explained in the TAP registry extension document (Demleitner et al, 2011). </blockquote> I don't feel strongly about either standardID or ivo-id. If you have strong feelings either way, please vent them over at TAPRegExt. The same goes for the element content (which is supposed to be a freetext label possibly for human consumption). -- IVOA.MarkusDemleitner - 11 Mar 2011 <br/> <!-- * Set ALLOWTOPICRENAME = %MAINWEB%.TWikiAdminGroup -->
Edit
|
Attach
|
Watch
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
:
r12
|
r7
<
r6
<
r5
<
r4
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Raw edit
|
More topic actions...
Topic revision: r5 - 2011-03-11
-
MarkusDemleitner
IVOA
Log in
or
Register
IVOA.net
Wiki Home
WebChanges
WebTopicList
WebStatistics
Twiki Meta & Help
IVOA
Know
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
TWiki intro
TWiki tutorial
User registration
Notify me
Working Groups
Applications
Data Access Layer
Data Model
Distributed Services & Protocols
Registry
Semantics
Interest Groups
Data Curation
Education
Knowledge Discovery
High Energy
Operations
Radio Astronomy
Solar System
Time Domain
Committees
Stds&Procs
www.ivoa.net
Documents
Events
Members
XML Schema
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback