Page with discussion items about the SNAP data model

Some questions:

Does TargetObjectType belong in the model?
TargetObjectType of Level N often requires Level N+1.

What types of characterisation are available and necessary?
Full (a posteriori) characterisation is when all values are explicitly given. From thereon one may get more and more vague by giving histograms (representing a probability density distribution), and then various less and less descriptive statistics. For small numbers (1,2,3) of objects one could however fully characterise the experiment already in the metadata using the actual value of objects.

Do we need a datatype in InputParameter?
This is hardly necessary for discovery and moreover can be obtained from the protocol for the experiment. Important are the name, the description+UCD and the value. In the domain model the only thing an InputParameter is is a reference to the Parameter (off the protocol) and the value.


Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r11 | r5 < r4 < r3 < r2 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r3 - 2007-10-23 - GerardLemson
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback