TAPRegExt-1.0 Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThis document serves as the RFC center for the Proposed Recommendation entitled "TAPRegExt: a VOResource Schema Extension for Describing TAP Services, Version 1.0". The latest version of TAPRegExt:Reference Interoperable Implementations | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Implementations Validators | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Any schema validator will do for syntactic validation. STILTS' taplint task does a partial semantic validation. | |||||||
RFC Review Period: 09 February 2012 - 08 March 2012TCG Review Period:Comments from the IVOA Community during RFC period: 09 February 2012 - 08 March 2012In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment. Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document<--
|
TAPRegExt-1.0 Proposed Recommendation: Request for CommentsThis document serves as the RFC center for the Proposed Recommendation entitled "TAPRegExt: a VOResource Schema Extension for Describing TAP Services, Version 1.0". The latest version of TAPRegExt:Reference Interoperable ImplementationsImplementations ValidatorsRFC Review Period: 09 February 2012 - 08 March 2012TCG Review Period:Comments from the IVOA Community during RFC period: 09 February 2012 - 08 March 2012In order to add a comment to the document, please edit this page and add your comment to the list below in the format used for the example (include your Wiki Name so that authors can contact you for further information). When the author(s) of the document have considered the comment, they will provide a response after the comment. Additional discussion about any of the comments or responses can be conducted on the WG mailing list. However, please be sure to enter your initial comments here for full consideration in any future revisions of this document<--
|