Difference: SIA20Err1 (2 vs. 3)

  META TOPICPARENT 
  name="SIAP_2-0_Errata"
- META TOPICPARENT
+  name="SIAP_2-0_Errata"
-<
<
+ Simple Image Access  version 2.0 Erratum 1: POS=RANGE examples inconsistent with spec
->
>
+ Simple Image Access version 2.0 Erratum 1: POS=RANGE examples inconsistent with spec
 Author: François Bonnarel

Date last changed: 2023-01-24
-<
<
+Date accepted:
->
>
+Date accepted: 2023-04-05
  Rationale 

In section  2.1.1, two RANGE examples display RANGE limits with either Inf or -Inf, + Inf. This is inconsistent with the spec which states that RA is in [0, 360] and DEC in [-90,90] and that no RANGE reduction should be required from SIA services implementations.
-<
<
 This bug orignally described on github in SIA issue #5 (https://github.com/ivoa-std/SIA/issues/5)

 Erratum Content 

This Erratum proposes following changes.

 Fix RANGE syntax
-<
<
+In §2.1.1 "*POS*" of SIA-2.0,
->
>
+In §2.1.1 "*POS*" of SIA-2.0,
-<
<
+update the RANGE example for the North Pole from
->
>
+update the RANGE example for the North Pole from
-<
<
 from
-<
<
 POS=RANGE 0 360.0 89.0 +Inf

to
-<
<
 POS=RANGE 0 360.0 89.0 90.0

and fix the RANGE example for the whole sky

from
-<
<
 POS=RANGE -Inf +Inf -Inf +Inf

to
-<
<
 POS=RANGE 0 360 -90 +90
-<
<
  Impact Assessment 

Fixing the RANGE syntax in an example will make no harm to any service and will avoid application implementers writing code requesting incorrect queries.
-<
<